Adalet Bakan\u0131 Y\u0131lmaz Tun\u00e7, Haber Global televizyonunun canl\u0131 yay\u0131n\u0131nda g\u00fcndeme ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmelerde bulundu ve sorular\u0131 yan\u0131tlad\u0131.\nGazze\u2019de insanl\u0131k su\u00e7u i\u015fleniyor\n
T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin Uluslararas\u0131 Adalet Divan\u0131ndaki Gazze sunumuna ili\u015fkin soru \u00fczerine\u00a0Tun\u00e7, \u0130srail\u2019in 7 Ekim 2023\u2019ten bu yana Gazze\u2019de insanl\u0131k su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fini, uluslararas\u0131 hukuka uymadan, bir devlet gibi de\u011fil, bir \u00f6rg\u00fct gibi davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 dile getirdi.\n
Gazze\u2019de akan kan\u0131n durmas\u0131 ad\u0131na T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin \u00e7e\u015fitli giri\u015fimlerde bulundu\u011funu an\u0131msatan\u00a0Tun\u00e7, Uluslararas\u0131 Adalet Divan\u0131n\u0131n \u00fclkelerden \u201cdan\u0131\u015fma g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u201d istedi\u011fini, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc veren ilk \u00fclkelerden biri oldu\u011funu vurgulad\u0131.\n
G\u00fcney Afrika\u2019n\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada Uluslararas\u0131 Adalet Divan\u0131n\u0131n \u201ctedbir\u201d karar\u0131 verdi\u011fini hat\u0131rlatan\u00a0Tun\u00e7, ayr\u0131ca Uluslararas\u0131 Ceza Mahkemesi savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n, su\u00e7u i\u015fleyen ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda da y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n bulundu\u011funu belirtti.\n
Soru\u015fturman\u0131n bir an \u00f6nce davaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi gerekti\u011fini vurgulayan\u00a0Tun\u00e7, \u201cUluslararas\u0131 Ceza Mahkemesinin soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n bir an \u00f6nce davaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi laz\u0131m. \u00d6zellikle sava\u015f su\u00e7unu, insanl\u0131k su\u00e7unu, soyk\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 i\u015fleyenlerin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 anlam\u0131nda.\u201d g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc payla\u015ft\u0131.\n
Uluslararas\u0131 Adalet Divan\u0131nda devletlerin yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret eden\u00a0Tun\u00e7, Soyk\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n \u00d6nlenmesi S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi kapsam\u0131nda G\u00fcney Afrika\u2019n\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada verilen \u201ctedbir\u201d karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulamaya konulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, bunun da G\u00fcvenlik Konseyi\u2019nin karar\u0131yla m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi.\n
Y\u0131lmaz\u00a0Tun\u00e7, \u201cTemennimiz bir an \u00f6nce orada akan kan\u0131n durmas\u0131. \u00c7ocuk katliam\u0131n\u0131n bir an \u00f6nce sona ermesi. \u0130nsanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00fc \u00f6n\u00fcnde bunlar\u0131n art\u0131k olmamas\u0131 gerekiyor. Uluslararas\u0131 hukukunu, insan haklar\u0131n\u0131, adaleti, mazlumun hakk\u0131n\u0131 savunmaya devam edece\u011fiz.\u201d diye konu\u015ftu.\nMaden kazalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin soru\u015fturmalar s\u00fcr\u00fcyor\n
Bakan\u00a0Tun\u00e7, soru \u00fczerine, Erzincan\u2019\u0131n \u0130li\u00e7 il\u00e7esindeki ve Elaz\u0131\u011f\u2019daki maden sahalar\u0131nda meydana gelen g\u00f6\u00e7\u00fck olaylar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan adli soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n derhal ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirdi.\n
\u0130li\u00e7\u2019teki olaya ili\u015fkin soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ilk etapta 8 ki\u015finin g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 6 ki\u015finin tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 an\u0131msatan\u00a0Tun\u00e7, adli soru\u015fturman\u0131n \u00f6nemli oldu\u011funu, ancak \u00f6nceliklerinin arama-kurtarma \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 oldu\u011funu anlatt\u0131.\n
Y\u0131lmaz\u00a0Tun\u00e7, \u201cYarg\u0131m\u0131za g\u00fcvenece\u011fiz. En detayl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde bu kazan\u0131n neden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve buna neden olan sebeplerde kimlerin sorumlu oldu\u011funu elbette ki ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z yarg\u0131m\u0131z ortaya \u00e7\u0131karacak. Kim sorumluysa bu kazadan, yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde elbette ki hesab\u0131n\u0131 verecektir.\u201d de\u011ferlendirmesinde bulundu.\n
Elaz\u0131\u011f\u2019daki g\u00f6\u00e7\u00fck nedeniyle ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n da s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc bildiren\u00a0Tun\u00e7, \u0130li\u00e7\u2019teki maden kazas\u0131na ili\u015fkin TBMM\u2019de de komisyon kuruldu\u011funu, Meclis\u2019in de bu konuyu ara\u015ft\u0131raca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 an\u0131msatt\u0131.\nKira art\u0131\u015f\u0131nda y\u00fczde 25 s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 Meclis\u2019in takdirinde\n
Adalet Bakan\u0131\u00a0Tun\u00e7, fahi\u015f kira art\u0131\u015flar\u0131 nedeniyle getirilen \u201cy\u00fczde 25 zam\u201d d\u00fczenlemesinin s\u00fcresinin 1 Temmuz\u2019da dolaca\u011f\u0131na dikkati \u00e7ekerek, s\u00f6z konusu d\u00fczenlemenin s\u00fcresinin uzat\u0131l\u0131p uzat\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n TBMM\u2019nin takdirinde oldu\u011funu ifade etti.\n
Tun\u00e7, \u201cMaliye Bakan\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n enflasyon oran\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesi noktas\u0131nda \u00e7abalar\u0131 var. Bir hedef de var. Hedefin tutturulmas\u0131 durumunda bu t\u00fcr s\u0131n\u0131rlamalara gerek kalmayabilece\u011fini s\u00f6yledim. \u00d6nceli\u011fimiz enflasyon hedefinin tutturulmas\u0131.\u201d s\u00f6zlerini sarf etti.\n
Kovid-19 salg\u0131n\u0131, depremler ve di\u011fer etkenler nedeniyle ekonominin olumsuz etkilendi\u011fini, kirac\u0131lar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 konusunda birtak\u0131m tedbirlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131 ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fdu\u011funu ifade eden\u00a0Tun\u00e7, \u201cMeclis b\u00f6yle bir tedbiri d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc. \u015eimdi bunun uzat\u0131l\u0131p uzat\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131yla ilgili husus o g\u00fcnk\u00fc \u015fartlara g\u00f6re belirlenecek.\u201d dedi.\n
Kira uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131na ili\u015fkin arabuluculu\u011fun zorunlu hale getirildi\u011fini hat\u0131rlatan\u00a0Tun\u00e7, bug\u00fcne kadar arabuluculara 132 bin 60 ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, anla\u015fma say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ise 71 bin 112 oldu\u011funu aktard\u0131.\n
FET\u00d6 ile m\u00fccadelede kesinlikle bir zafiyet olamaz\n
Bakan\u00a0Tun\u00e7, Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kurulu (HSK) taraf\u0131ndan ihra\u00e7 edilen baz\u0131 hakimlerin, Dan\u0131\u015ftay taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6revlerine iade edildikleri hat\u0131rlat\u0131larak, \u201cFET\u00d6 ile m\u00fccadelede zafiyet mi var?\u201d sorusuna, \u201cFET\u00d6 ile m\u00fccadelede kesinlikle bir zafiyet olamaz.\u201d yan\u0131t\u0131n\u0131 verdi.\n
T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin b\u00fct\u00fcn ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleriyle kararl\u0131 bir m\u00fccadele s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc kaydeden\u00a0Tun\u00e7, 15 Temmuz darbe giri\u015fiminin ard\u0131ndan 4 bin 6 hakim ve savc\u0131n\u0131n da ihra\u00e7 edildi\u011fini hat\u0131rlatt\u0131.\n
\u0130hra\u00e7 edilen hakim ve savc\u0131lardan 3 bin 888\u2019inin Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019a dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten\u00a0Tun\u00e7, 387\u2019sinin g\u00f6reve iadesinin kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ki\u015filerden 371\u2019inin g\u00f6reve iade edildi\u011fini bildirdi.\n
G\u00f6reve iadeler konusunda HSK\u2019nin Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019a itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, temyiz a\u015famas\u0131nda olan davalar\u0131n bulundu\u011funu vurgulayan\u00a0Tun\u00e7, \u015f\u00f6yle devam etti:\n
\u201cBu 371 ki\u015fiyle ilgili kamuoyundaki endi\u015feyi de ortadan kald\u0131rmak ad\u0131na, e\u011fer incelemede bir hata varsa, sonradan \u00e7\u0131kan bir delil de olabilir, sonradan ifadelerde ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en, ByLock kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enlerle ilgili HSK yeni bir inceleme ba\u015flatt\u0131. Tefti\u015f Kurulu g\u00f6revli bu noktada. Her dosya tek tek incelenecek. Hatal\u0131 davran\u0131lmamas\u0131 noktas\u0131nda titiz davran\u0131lacak. E\u011fer bir hata s\u00f6z konusuysa bu konuda yeniden bir soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131labilir bu ki\u015filer bak\u0131m\u0131ndan. Soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa al\u0131nabilir. O s\u00fcre\u00e7 kendi mecras\u0131nda devam eder. Burada FET\u00d6 ile m\u00fccadeledeki kararl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zdan hi\u00e7bir zaman taviz veremeyiz. Yarg\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinde g\u00f6zden ka\u00e7an bir husus olursa da gerekli inceleme ve soru\u015fturma yine HSK\u2019nin elindeki bir husus.\u201d\n
Adalet Bakan\u0131\u00a0Tun\u00e7, Gezi Park\u0131 davas\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fc Can Atalay\u2019\u0131n milletvekilli\u011finin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin ard\u0131ndan CHP\u2019nin ve Atalay\u2019\u0131n avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuruda Anayasa Mahkemesinin \u201ckarar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na\u201d dair karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmelerde de bulundu.\n
Atalay\u2019\u0131n milletvekilli\u011finin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n TBMM Genel Kurulunda okundu\u011funu, bir oylaman\u0131n yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten\u00a0Tun\u00e7, \u201cBurada \u2018Meclis\u2019in ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir karar yoktur, bir i\u015flem yoktur\u2019, bu nedenle karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015fse \u2018ret\u2019 karar\u0131na yak\u0131n olur. Ama Meclis\u2019te okunan kesin h\u00fckm\u00fcn \u2018hukuki de\u011feri yoktur, Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 usuls\u00fczd\u00fcr\u2019 diye bir karar verir de karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na derse o Anayasa\u2019ya, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir karar olur. Onu gerek\u00e7eli karar okunduktan sonra g\u00f6rece\u011fiz.\u201d ifadesini kulland\u0131.\n
Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 83. maddesinde yer alan dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u201cbir milletvekilinin se\u00e7imden \u00f6nce ya da sonra i\u015fledi\u011fi bir su\u00e7 i\u00e7in tutuklanamaz\u201d \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini aktaran\u00a0Tun\u00e7, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 14. maddesi kapsam\u0131ndaki \u201cdevletin g\u00fcvenli\u011fine ili\u015fkin su\u00e7lar\u201d\u0131n a\u011f\u0131r cezal\u0131k su\u00e7 \u00fcst\u00fc hali ile se\u00e7imden \u00f6nce soru\u015fturmas\u0131na ba\u015flan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olunmas\u0131 durumlar\u0131n\u0131n ise bu durumun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi.\n
Y\u00fcksek Mahkemeler aras\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f fark\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa ya da yasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ile giderilebilece\u011fini belirten\u00a0Tun\u00e7, s\u00f6zlerini \u015f\u00f6yle s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc:\n
\u201cSe\u00e7imden \u00f6nce soru\u015fturmas\u0131na ba\u015flanan ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131, dokunulmazl\u0131k kapsam\u0131nda m\u0131 de\u011fil mi? Yani Kandil\u2019deki bir ter\u00f6rist eleba\u015f\u0131 aday g\u00f6sterildi\u011finde, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de bir sab\u0131kas\u0131 yok, yarg\u0131lanamad\u0131 \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc, bu ki\u015fi aday g\u00f6sterildi\u011finde Kandil\u2019den gelip Meclis\u2019te yemin edebilsin mi? Ya da Pensilvanya\u2019daki FET\u00d6 eleba\u015f\u0131 se\u00e7ildi\u011finde gelip TBMM\u2019de yemin edebilsin mi? Anayasa bu g\u00fcvenceyi \u015f\u00f6yle koymu\u015f; \u2018se\u00e7imden \u00f6nce soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flam\u0131\u015fsa ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131 dokunulmazl\u0131k kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fildir\u2019 demi\u015f. Yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 devam eder, yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 bitti\u011finde de kesin h\u00fck\u00fcm Meclis\u2019te okunur ve milletvekilli\u011fi d\u00fc\u015fer. Anayasa Mahkemesi ile Yarg\u0131tay aras\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f fark\u0131 buradan kaynakland\u0131. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 83. ve 14. maddelerinin Anayasa Mahkememiz taraf\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 yorumlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle buralara gelindi ve uyulmamayla sonu\u00e7lanacak bir duruma geldik. Bu t\u00fcr tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 sona erdirmenin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc anayasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi, uzla\u015fma olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde ise kanun de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi.\n
Bireysel ba\u015fvuru 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda Anayasa\u2019m\u0131za girdi. Bireysel ba\u015fvuru, kesinle\u015fmi\u015f h\u00fck\u00fcmlerden kaynaklanan hak ihlallerinin incelenmesi durumunda, Anayasa Mahkemesinin bireysel ba\u015fvuruya bakan b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6zellikle Yarg\u0131tay ve Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019dan gelen \u00fcyelerden olu\u015fmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir anayasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yap\u0131labilir. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 148. maddesine kanun koyucu, bu g\u00f6rev karma\u015fas\u0131n\u0131n olmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u2018bireysel ba\u015fvuruda kanun yolunda yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken inceleme yap\u0131lamaz\u2019 demi\u015f. S\u00fcper temyiz mahkemesi olmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in. Ama maalesef gelinen noktada bu karma\u015fay\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcyoruz. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi ihlal kararlar\u0131, ceza muhakemesi kanunumuzda yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi sebebidir. \u2018Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131 da yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi sebebidir\u2019 diye ceza muhakemesi kanunumuza koydu\u011fumuz zaman asl\u0131nda bu sorun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oluruz. Bu da Meclisimizin takdirinde olan bir husus.\u201d\n
\u00a0\n","created_at":"2024-02-27T14:18:10.000000Z","updated_at":"2024-02-27T14:18:10.000000Z"}